Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Gibb's avatar

“We decide what to believe by deciding who to believe.“ Arnold Kling

Similarly, I argue that we decide how devout to be by deciding how devout others will likely be.

There can be heavy pressure on LDS men to serve a mission. Serving a mission shows devotion. This added devotion is likely to result in marriage with a more devout spouse.

But what happens if devotion begins to fall among teenagers? What if teenagers get the sense that their peers are becoming less devout? What if apostasy is on the rise among the youth?

If serving a mission shows devotion, but the pool of candidate spouses is trending toward less devout, then a mission may worsen your marriage prospects, or more likely, be less worthwhile.

Missions are important devices for the devout or those wanting to be married to a devout spouse. But what if you don’t want to be married to a devout spouse?

Then serving a mission would be less beneficial.

Serving a mission has game theoretic qualities. See the Prisoner’s Dilemma.

The ultimate goal is not to be devout, but rather to pursue knowledge that will serve you and your future family best.

In summary, game theory in the context of identifying a spouse may help explain “What is driving the generational decline in LDS devotion, and does missionary service still strengthen devotion the way it used to?”

Elaine Jones's avatar

I would like to see stats on early returning missionaries. I don’t feel like there has been transparency from the Church on this issue. I would like to state that there is nothing wrong or any shame in coming home early. We need to accept that different people have different experiences and support and love them.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?