Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bayesian's avatar

Hi Alex -

Moderate time reader, first time commenter :)

Thanks for all the excellent context and highest regards. In case it matters (viewpoint epistemology and all that) I'm an LDS friendly atheist living in a part of Southern California with a reasonably high LDS presence - I'd guess my children's high school was probably 10-12% LDS; my grandparents were all southern-inflected Baptists of varying levels of orthopraxy against which my parents independently rebelled pretty hard (before meeting each other).

I'll point one rather obvious variable for the post-2014 shift, namely some changes that started becoming quite visible in the Republican Party starting late 2015; if you could find some finer granularity time series to at least temporally correlate (GSS is biennial and of course you have the pre and post election sides of the CES) that would be very interesting.

(I'm embarrassed to say that I don't speak R so I can't easily mung your code for myself, although I suspect my high powered "AI" could probably translate the R into MATLAB at which I am a decent 2L speaker with all the statistics addons).

Would be fascinating to compare, if the statistics exists, similar statistics for LDS growth, disaffiliation, etc. for other first world countries with relatively high LDS populations and at least hypothetically similar sociological placement of LDS versus Gentile. You'd also have to take a look at how geographically concentrated versus not those other-country LDS are; I would expect LDS in other countries might have a more urban concentration than the US, but not the state level concentration we do (where less than a third of the Church members live east of the Rockies , although that is slowly changes as you know far better than I).

That's going to be a little tough since per https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/ there are only a few candidates above 1%: NZ, Chile, and Uruguay.

Given the enormous LDS penetration into the South Pacific, I'd have to wonder what fraction of the 2.3% (!) of New Zealanders who are LDS would code "white" by NZ standards.

Coding Pacific Islander (about 7% of the total NZ population) would play hugely into the NZ LDS' sociological position versus the broader NZ culture (plus in NZ you have the very unique position of the Maori, very different than e.g. Aboriginals in Australia: 0.6% LDS or Canada: 0.5%).

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?