Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adam Stevenson's avatar

This is really interesting! I’ve lived both in Utah and in other parts of the country (I currently live in DC) and from what I’ve observed it appears that most new homes in Utah are being built on the suburban fringe versus in existing urbanized areas. These new developments may be less space constrained and thus end up consuming more space. Though this story of suburban development is generally the case in the rest of the country, another factor may be the relatively strong economic growth in Utah over the past decade or more and the positive correlation between income and the square footage of housing (at least in the US). Zoning also plays a big part in determining median home size, although in most of the US single-family detached homes are allowed by-right while multi-family or “missing middle” type housing (like rowhomes, duplexes, attached homes, condos, etc.) are only allowed in urban cores. There are a lot of regulatory factors (zoning, minimum parking requirements, other car-centric codes) that subsidize and enforce suburbanization across the country, but I don’t necessarily see those factors as being relatively stronger in Utah, so I would assume cultural and economic factors are maybe more of a factor here. Thanks for this thought-provoking post!

Robert Bushman's avatar

With all their vaunted spirituality, Mormons are as materialistic as the best of them.

No posts

Ready for more?